Given f(x)=ln(g(x)) for all x∈R, where g(x)∈(0,∞), we can express g(x) as:
g(x)=ef(x)
Differentiating both sides with respect to x, we get:
g′(x)=ef(x)⋅f′(x)=g(x)f′(x)
Since g(x)>0 for all x∈R, the sign of g′(x) is identical to the sign of f′(x). Therefore, g(x) has a local maximum at a point x0 if and only if f′(x) changes sign from positive to negative as x increases through x0.
We are given the first derivative of f(x) as:
f′(x)=2010(x−2009)1(x−2010)2(x−2011)3(x−2012)4
The critical points of f(x) are x=2009,2010,2011,2012.
Let us analyze the sign of f′(x) across the intervals formed by these critical points:
-
For x<2009:
- (x−2009)<0
- (x−2010)2>0
- (x−2011)3<0
- (x−2012)4>0
- Thus, f′(x)>0.
-
For 2009<x<2010:
- (x−2009)>0
- (x−2010)2>0
- (x−2011)3<0
- (x−2012)4>0
- Thus, f′(x)<0.
Since f′(x) changes sign from positive to negative as x passes through 2009, f(x) (and consequently g(x)) has a local maximum at x=2009.
-
For 2010<x<2011:
- (x−2009)>0
- (x−2010)2>0
- (x−2011)3<0
- (x−2012)4>0
- Thus, f′(x)<0.
Since f′(x) does not change sign across x=2010, x=2010 is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum.
-
For 2011<x<2012:
- (x−2009)>0
- (x−2010)2>0
- (x−2011)3>0
- (x−2012)4>0
- Thus, f′(x)>0.
Since f′(x) changes sign from negative to positive at x=2011, x=2011 is a point of local minimum.
-
For x>2012:
- All factors are positive, so f′(x)>0.
Since f′(x) does not change sign across x=2012, x=2012 is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum.
From the above analysis, g(x) has a local maximum at only one point, which is x=2009.
Hence, the number of points in R at which g has a local maximum is 1.