JEE Challenger
More from Application of Derivatives

Number of Roots of Derivative Combination Using Rolles Theorem

Let f,g:[−1,2]→Rf, g: [-1, 2] \to \mathbb{R} be continuous functions that are twice differentiable on the interval (−1,2)(-1, 2). Suppose the values of ff and gg at the points −1,0,-1, 0, and 22 are given in the following table:

\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|}\hline & x = -1 & x = 0 & x = 2 \hline f(x) & 3 & 6 & 0 \hline g(x) & 0 & 1 & -1 \hline\end{array}

In each of the open subintervals (−1,0)(-1, 0) and (0,2)(0, 2), the second derivative (f−3g)′′(f - 3g)'' never vanishes. Then the correct assertion(s) is(are)

Options

A

f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly three solutions in (−1,0)∪(0,2)(-1, 0) \cup (0, 2)

B

f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly one solution in (−1,0)(-1, 0)

Correct
C

f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly one solution in (0,2)(0, 2)

Correct
D

f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly two solutions in (−1,0)(-1, 0) and exactly two solutions in (0,2)(0, 2)

Step-by-Step Solution

To determine the number of solutions to the equation f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 in the given intervals, let us define an auxiliary function h:[−1,2]→Rh: [-1, 2] \to \mathbb{R} by: h(x)=f(x)−3g(x)h(x) = f(x) - 3g(x)

1. Continuity and Differentiability

Since ff and gg are continuous on [−1,2][-1, 2] and twice differentiable on (−1,2)(-1, 2), the function hh is also:

  • Continuous on [−1,2][-1, 2]
  • Twice differentiable on (−1,2)(-1, 2)

2. Value of h(x)h(x) at the Given Points

Using the given table of values for f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x):

  • At x=−1x = -1: h(−1)=f(−1)−3g(−1)=3−3(0)=3h(-1) = f(-1) - 3g(-1) = 3 - 3(0) = 3

  • At x=0x = 0: h(0)=f(0)−3g(0)=6−3(1)=3h(0) = f(0) - 3g(0) = 6 - 3(1) = 3

  • At x=2x = 2: h(2)=f(2)−3g(2)=0−3(−1)=3h(2) = f(2) - 3g(2) = 0 - 3(-1) = 3

Thus, we have: h(−1)=h(0)=h(2)=3h(-1) = h(0) = h(2) = 3


3. Existence of Solutions Using Rolle's Theorem

  • In the interval [−1,0][-1, 0]: The function h(x)h(x) is continuous on [−1,0][-1, 0], differentiable on (−1,0)(-1, 0), and h(−1)=h(0)=3h(-1) = h(0) = 3. By Rolle's Theorem, there exists at least one c1∈(−1,0)c_1 \in (-1, 0) such that: h′(c1)=0  ⟹  f′(c1)−3g′(c1)=0h'(c_1) = 0 \implies f'(c_1) - 3g'(c_1) = 0

  • In the interval [0,2][0, 2]: The function h(x)h(x) is continuous on [0,2][0, 2], differentiable on (0,2)(0, 2), and h(0)=h(2)=3h(0) = h(2) = 3. By Rolle's Theorem, there exists at least one c2∈(0,2)c_2 \in (0, 2) such that: h′(c2)=0  ⟹  f′(c2)−3g′(c2)=0h'(c_2) = 0 \implies f'(c_2) - 3g'(c_2) = 0


4. Uniqueness of Solutions

We are given that h′′(x)=(f−3g)′′(x)≠0h''(x) = (f - 3g)''(x) \neq 0 for all x∈(−1,0)x \in (-1, 0) and x∈(0,2)x \in (0, 2).

  • Uniqueness in (−1,0)(-1, 0): Suppose h′(x)=0h'(x) = 0 has two or more solutions in (−1,0)(-1, 0). Let a,b∈(−1,0)a, b \in (-1, 0) with a<ba < b be two distinct roots such that h′(a)=0h'(a) = 0 and h′(b)=0h'(b) = 0. By Rolle's Theorem applied to h′(x)h'(x) on [a,b][a, b], there must exist some k∈(a,b)⊂(−1,0)k \in (a, b) \subset (-1, 0) such that: h′′(k)=0h''(k) = 0 This contradicts the given condition that h′′(x)h''(x) never vanishes in (−1,0)(-1, 0). Thus, h′(x)=0h'(x) = 0 can have at most one solution in (−1,0)(-1, 0). Since it has at least one solution, it must have exactly one solution in (−1,0)(-1, 0).

  • Uniqueness in (0,2)(0, 2): By the exact same reasoning, if h′(x)=0h'(x) = 0 had two or more solutions in (0,2)(0, 2), then h′′(x)h''(x) would vanish at least once in (0,2)(0, 2), which contradicts the given premise. Therefore, h′(x)=0h'(x) = 0 has exactly one solution in (0,2)(0, 2).


Conclusion

  • In (−1,0)(-1, 0), f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly one solution. (Option B is correct)
  • In (0,2)(0, 2), f′(x)−3g′(x)=0f'(x) - 3g'(x) = 0 has exactly one solution. (Option C is correct)
  • The total number of solutions in (−1,0)∪(0,2)(-1, 0) \cup (0, 2) is 1+1=21 + 1 = 2 (hence Options A and D are incorrect).

Correct Options: (B) and (C)