To find the maximum possible value of the determinant of a 3×3 matrix P with entries taken from the set {−1,0,1}, we analyze the upper bound using Hadamard's Inequality and matrix properties.
Step 1: Applying Hadamard's Inequality
Let R1,R2,R3 be the row vectors of P. Hadamard's inequality states that:
∣det(P)∣≤∥R1∥∥R2∥∥R3∥
Since each entry aij∈{−1,0,1}, we have aij2≤1. Therefore, the squared norm of each row vector satisfies:
∥Ri∥2=∑j=13aij2≤1+1+1=3⟹∥Ri∥≤3
Applying this to Hadamard's inequality gives:
∣det(P)∣≤3×3×3=33≈5.196
Since P is an integer matrix, det(P) must be an integer. Hence, ∣det(P)∣≤5.
Step 2: Refining the Upper Bound
Case 1: All rows have the maximum norm ∥Ri∥2=3
In this case, all entries of P belong to {−1,1}.
The inner product of any two distinct rows Ri⋅Rj=cij=∑k=13aikajk.
Since aikajk∈{−1,1}, the sum of three such terms must be an odd integer, so cij∈{−3,−1,1,3}.
If cij=±3, then Ri=±Rj, which implies det(P)=0.
For a non-zero determinant, we must have cij∈{−1,1} for all i=j.
Now consider the product PPT:
PPT=3c12c13c123c23c13c233
The determinant of PPT is:
det(PPT)=(detP)2=3(9−c232)−c12(3c12−c13c23)+c13(c12c23−3c13)
Using c122=c132=c232=1:
(detP)2=3(8)−(3−c12c13c23)+(c12c13c23−3)=18+2c12c13c23
Since c12c13c23∈{−1,1}:
If c12c13c23=1, then (detP)2=20. However, 20 is not an integer, so no such matrix exists.
If c12c13c23=−1, then (detP)2=16⟹∣detP∣=4.
Case 2: At least one row has ∥Ri∥2≤2
If at least one row contains a zero entry, its length is at most 2. By Hadamard's Inequality:
∣det(P)∣≤3×3×2=18≈4.24
Since det(P) must be an integer, ∣det(P)∣≤4.
Thus, in all cases, the upper bound for the determinant is 4.
Step 3: Constructing an Example with det(P)=4
Consider the matrix:
P=1111−1111−1
Expanding along the first row:
det(P)=1((−1)(−1)−(1)(1))−1((1)(−1)−(1)(1))+1((1)(1)−(−1)(1))det(P)=1(1−1)−1(−1−1)+1(1+1)=0+2+2=4
Conclusion
The maximum possible value of the determinant of P is 4.