To solve this problem, we will analyze the given limit and apply L'Hôpital's Rule alongside the properties of the functions f and g.
Step 1: Evaluate the Limit
We are given the limit:
limx→2f′(x)g′(x)f(x)g(x)=1
We can rewrite the expression inside the limit as a product of two ratios:
limx→2(g′(x)f(x)⋅f′(x)g(x))=1
Given that f,g are twice differentiable and their second derivatives f′′,g′′ are continuous:
- Since f:R→(0,∞), we have f(x)>0 for all x∈R, which implies f(2)>0. By continuity of f, limx→2f(x)=f(2)>0.
- Since g′(2)=0 and g′′ is continuous, g′ is continuous at x=2, so limx→2g′(x)=g′(2)=0.
Thus, the first factor has a finite non-zero limit:
limx→2g′(x)f(x)=g′(2)f(2)
Now, consider the second factor f′(x)g(x) as x→2:
Since g(2)=0 and f′(2)=0, this limit presents an indeterminate form of 00.
Applying L'Hôpital's Rule to limx→2f′(x)g(x):
limx→2f′(x)g(x)=limx→2f′′(x)g′(x)=f′′(2)g′(2)
(This step is valid because g′ and f′′ are continuous at x=2 and f′′(2)=0).
Step 2: Combine the Limits
Substituting these back into the original limit expression:
limx→2f′(x)g′(x)f(x)g(x)=(g′(2)f(2))⋅(f′′(2)g′(2))=f′′(2)f(2)
Given that this limit equals 1:
f′′(2)f(2)=1⟹f′′(2)=f(2)
Step 3: Analyze the Options
-
Local Extrema at x=2 (Options A and B):
- We know f(x)>0 for all x∈R, so f(2)>0.
- Since f′′(2)=f(2), it follows that f′′(2)>0.
- We are given f′(2)=0.
- By the Second Derivative Test, since f′(2)=0 and f′′(2)>0, f has a local minimum at x=2.
- Thus, Option (A) is correct and Option (B) is incorrect.
-
Comparison of f′′(2) and f(2) (Option C):
- From our derivation, f′′(2)=f(2), so f′′(2)>f(2) is false.
- Thus, Option (C) is incorrect.
-
Existence of x∈R such that f(x)−f′′(x)=0 (Option D):
- Since f′′(2)=f(2), at x=2 we have:
f(2)−f′′(2)=0
- Hence, f(x)−f′′(x)=0 holds for at least one x∈R (namely, x=2).
- Thus, Option (D) is correct.
Conclusion
The correct options are A and D.