To determine the correct statements, we first simplify the expression for f(x) for any x>0.
Given:
f(x)=limn→∞(n!(x2+n2)(x2+4n2)⋯(x2+n2n2)nn(x+n)(x+2n)⋯(x+nn))nx
Let Pn(x) be the product expression inside the exponent:
Pn(x)=n!∏r=1n(x2+r2n2)nn∏r=1n(x+rn)
Rewriting the product terms in the numerator:
∏r=1n(x+rn)=∏r=1nrn(1+nrx)=n!nn∏r=1n(1+nrx)
Rewriting the product terms in the denominator:
∏r=1n(x2+r2n2)=∏r=1nr2n2(1+n2r2x2)=(n!)2n2n∏r=1n(1+n2r2x2)
Substituting these back into Pn(x):
Pn(x)=n!⋅(n!)2n2n∏r=1n(1+n2r2x2)nn⋅n!nn∏r=1n(1+nrx)=∏r=1n1+n2r2x21+nrx
Now, taking the natural logarithm of f(x):
lnf(x)=ln(limn→∞(Pn(x))nx)=limn→∞nx∑r=1nln(1+n2r2x21+nrx)
Expressing this limit as a definite integral (Riemann sum):
lnf(x)=x∫01ln(1+t2x21+tx)dt
Using the substitution u=tx (where du=xdt), the limits change from t=0→u=0 and t=1→u=x:
lnf(x)=∫0x(ln(1+u)−ln(1+u2))du
Differentiating both sides with respect to x using the Leibniz Rule:
dxd(lnf(x))=f(x)f′(x)=ln(1+x)−ln(1+x2)=ln(1+x21+x)
Since f(x)>0 for all x>0:
- For x∈(0,1), 1+x21+x>1⟹ln(1+x21+x)>0⟹f′(x)>0. Thus, f(x) is strictly increasing on (0,1).
- For x>1, 1+x21+x<1⟹ln(1+x21+x)<0⟹f′(x)<0. Thus, f(x) is strictly decreasing on (1,∞).
Now we evaluate each option:
- Option A: Since f(x) is strictly increasing on (0,1) and 21<1, we have f(21)<f(1). Thus, option A is incorrect.
- Option B: Since 31<32<1 and f(x) is strictly increasing on (0,1), f(31)<f(32), which satisfies f(31)≤f(32). Thus, option B is correct.
- Option C: For x=2>1, f′(2)<0, which satisfies f′(2)≤0. Thus, option C is correct.
- Option D: Calculating f(x)f′(x)=ln(1+x21+x):
f(2)f′(2)=ln(53)
f(3)f′(3)=ln(104)=ln(52)
Since 52<53, it follows that f(3)f′(3)<f(2)f′(2). Thus, option D is incorrect.
Conclusion:
The correct statements are B and C.